Same-Sex Marriage Australia
A Road the Loving Don’t Travel
Please realise this website is not a ‘hate’ site. It’s a fact site. Cut and dry, analytical and as much as possible (because complete neutrality is impossible for anyone) we’ll try and be upfront where opinions and interpretations cannot be thoroughly supported.
We’d love it if the “yes” camp worked that way.
We encourage you to take this slow, realise this is about ‘gender flexing’ both marriage and society at large, and that there is evidence in abundance and sound reasoning behind why marriage should not be redefined. But you wouldn’t know it unless you went out of your way to find it – especially if you’re on a drip feed from certain media outlets (which I won’t name yet cause we’ve got work to do and we aren’t investing resources into that one, just yet).
Why We Encourage You to Go Slow
Most activists know their numbers are rubbery and they rightly fear time and truth.
We encourage you to go slow. Ignore the ABS survey letter’s harassment. The blatant “yes” camp hassle of, “Have your say … and do it today!” is shameless.
Remember that time and intelligence is your friend, not theirs. You’ve got until the end of OCTOBER to mail your form, so please … SLOW DOWN!
The “yes” camp want you to respond quickly, because facts do not support them. Rational thought does not support them. The evidence of nations does not support them. This is why they have fought this process through parliament, media and to the highest court of the land.
If the gender activists really thought 70% of the population wanted marriage redefined they would have welcomed a plebiscite. But they know better. Most activists know their numbers are rubbery and they rightly fear time and truth (and note that the majority of same sex people are not activists – and many do not want this definition changed, as we’ll show you).
After infiltrating, utilising, exploiting and ultimately denying your democratic rights for decades, their operatives and converts now work to invalidate the very postal survey we are now experiencing. With stolen letters, destroyed returns (after a quick check with a torch) and a media-controlling campaign any dictatorship or regime would be proud of, this is quickly becoming a joke …
… BUT it has given you official permission to ask questions and speak openly … well, almost.
It’s shameful that it came to this, but it did. So we have to fight for what we have.
Why the ‘Gender-Flex’ Label is Appropriate
This ‘Gender-Flex’ label IS appropriate. If the politicians were honest, they’d show you the legislation and you’d see what we mean (and we will show you by the way).
What you are being asked to give consent to is far more than permitting the marriage of two same-sex attracted people.
Answering the Questions
If you thought surrendering to demands for “marriage” would end the gender thuggery and institutionalised child abuse we now see, the evidence of nations will show you otherwise.
1. What happened in countries that redefined marriage?
Things changed. As you’re about to learn.
2. Has increased legal power been exploited by gender activists?
3. Have they proven trustworthy?
Absolutely not. They’ve been universally nice UNTIL they have the power. Then, they have become ruthless.
4. Have the promises held true?
We haven’t found ONE country yet where promises made to protect freedoms have hale true.
But What Changes?
By listing specific examples, we’ll show you that, despite the promises, the gender
- Children’s Education
- Family Life
- Freedom of Speech
- Freedom of Conscience, and
- Freedom of Religion?
- and more
Your “Yes” Behind a Loving “No”
Yes, the short-term ‘feel good’ is to support a ‘gender-flex’ marriage. Yes, we’re all fatigued by the harassment and the battle. Yes, people have been hurt and will continue to be. Yes, the seemingly ‘safe’ option is to stay quiet. Yes, gender-politics rules our nation. Yes, we want to move on. Yes, we’re being lied to.
With all this in mind, a “Yes” seems easy.
But supporting a ‘gender-flex’ marriage doesn’t stop any of that.
It just gives momentum and unimaginable legal clout to their cause! If you thought surrendering to demands for “marriage” would end the gender thuggery and institutionalised child abuse we now see, the evidence of nations will show you otherwise.
Most importantly, It creates enormous difficulties for children, and as his has been wisely stated, there is no greater reflection of the society than the way it treats its most vulnerable. LGBT plus activists have trained generations of same-sex attracted people to see themselves as victims and to portray themselves in this way. They have done this very successfully, and we have prioritised them highly.
As we are all vulnerable to becoming, they have become become selfish, introspective and blinkered. And again, like the rest of us, they have too easily placed their own needs above those of children. But are we not collectively responsible to build, lead, nurture and protect them? Amongst these young people, a small (though increasing) number might find themselves same-sex attracted. Would life for them be easier in a more gay-affirming nation? Perhaps? It’s a disputable point (which we’ll also show given time). But even if it did help – the price will be immense.
When you say, “Yes”, that simply isn’t loving.
In your service