Removing Parental Rights and Vandalising Family

In nations where marriage has been redefined, where ‘family’ once nurtured and protected children, things have changed. Of course, changes have already happened anywhere marriage has been devalued – here in Australia also. But it would be naïve in the extreme to pretend that the most alarming, significant, and swift abuses of marriage, family and childhood – and the negative consequences that flow from this – are most evident in countries that have surrendered to same-sex ‘marriage” (SSM).

Once you remove (or significantly redefine) the role and legal rights of parents, you ARE able to dismantle the family. In post-SSM nations children become tools of the state, and like pawns on a chessboard, they become weapons of the revolution and prizes for capture.

If the significance of the last sentence escaped your attention, please be encouraged to read it again. Then ask yourself, with all sobriety, “Have I been seeing aspects of this already?”

With the redefinition of marriage:

1. Children become possessions.
2. The term and role of parent is radically redefined.
3. Complicated issues like gay ‘adoption’ are settled fait accompli.
4. Fathers and mothers are devalued and denied the most basic of rights.
5. Gender dysphoria and other very significant issues are taken out of the hands of parents.
6. Educational and government interferences are given absolute state sanction.
7. Alternative adult influences and ideology are given unprecedented power.

Are these statements too bold? You and I have been trained for decades to read such words as extreme. But are they?

Family is the core unit of society, and parents are the leaders and shapers of the family. Sure, there’s external influences, and these are significant, but the evidence of history is that once the meaning of ‘family’ is redefined and parental rights are reduced, either societal collapse or a dictatorship is not far ahead. 

Please take your time on this, and consider the question with sobriety and wisdom.

NORWAY | Fatherhood Reduced to Sperm Donating

During SSM protests in Norway, one member of Parliament specifically addressed the issue of artificial insemination of lesbians and bisexuals in same-sex relationships. That this creates ‘a system where the father is reduced to a sperm sample’ is of course technically true. What is truly disturbing though is the ease with which marriage redefining nations deny children what is biologically and legally there right. Such an abuse could not happen unless LGBT++ groups had secured a privileged status in society. Their desires now take precedent over the legitimate rights of children. And no doubt, more is to come.

Please note: For Norway, gender ideologies are well established after 8 years with gender-diverse marriage.

Source file published 2008 and available here. 

FINLAND | Parents removed from Birth Certificates at the Whim of a Gay Parent’s Partner

In Finland, the partner of a biological parent can declare themselves “parent” on a child’s birth certificate. Though this articles speaks about father’s having their names removed, the same law applies when children are raised by a homosexual father’s partner – or perhaps sometime in the future, by multiple other adults.

Please note: As a nation that has not YET surrendered to gender-diverse marriage, these are only introductory skirmishes of what is to come.

Source file published September 2017 and available here. 

NEW ZEALAND | Who is Forgotten Here?

The elevated, privileged and now culturally sacred status of LGBT++ adults is highlighted here. Changes to New Zealand law allow full rights to bisexual adults to adopt children, yet New Zealand law does not allow a single male to legally adopt a female child. Presuming, and I assume this is a safe presumption, this single mail adoption law is based on potential threats pertaining to sexual abuse, the inference seems clear: single heterosexual men are a significant potential sexual threat, whereas a coupled bisexual or gender confused adult, male or female, does not pose any notable threat. Anybody notice who is being privileged here?

Please note: For New Zealand, it’s still early days of queer theory programming, after only 4 years with gender-diverse marriage.

Source file published March 2013 and available here. 

CANADA | The Parent-Elected Board Overruled: K-1 Children Receive LGBT++ Indoctrination

A parent elected School Board refuses a teacher’s request to use LGBT++ books in class. Why? They decided children at the K‑1 level:

1. Should not be exposed to ideas that might conflict with the beliefs of their parents,
2. That children of this age were too young to learn about same‑sex parented families, and
3. That the material was not necessary to achieve the learning outcomes in the curriculum.

All good reasons right? The Canadian courts squashed that long-standing power after LGBT++ advocates appealed. Another example of LGBT++ goals being achieved via court enforcement of gender-fluid discriminatory abuse. 

Please note: For Canada, chaotic gender ideologies are thoroughly ingrained after 12 years with gender-diverse marriage.

Source file published December 2012 and available here.

USA | Adoption Agencies Forced to Close

Numerous adoption agencies have been forced to close as they cannot in good conscience assist children to be placed with same-sex couples. Agree or disagree with their stance, recognise the deliberate and systematic reshaping of ‘family’ by LGBT++ activists. Other agencies can accommodate the desire of gay couples to adopt; however to enforce their worldview upon society, they choose to force the shutdown of critical and otherwise successful child services. It’s all about them isn’t it (and I don’t mean the real children – I mean the ones in the grown up bodies). 

Please note: For the United States, it’s still early days of queer theory programming, after only 2 years with gender-diverse marriage.

Source file available here.